Where is Grant Patel?

For a long time the most frequent commenter on blogs in Chinatown was the notorious degenerate and wanna-be pervert Grant Patel. Who claimed to be a lawyer and a Parsee.

Whose own odd blog is here: http://grantpatel.blogspot.com/


A recent quotable bit of insanity from the pen of Grant Patel:
"First she waves her panties in my face, then she refuses my kind responsive attentions! I am all of the flutter accordingly! And quite quite infuriated!Here I had striven to argua her into accepting my reasoned contention, yet she denies! Denies!"
From this post: http://grantpatel.blogspot.com/2009/09/get-your-pnaties-outta-my-face.html


Yeah man, I can SO believe that you are really interested in miss Wong. Sure. Uh huh.

You didn't even notice that she turned seventeen!!!

What kind of stalker are you?
A mere amateur, hmmph, not even capable of keeping track of birthdays. You could've sent her flowers, you creep, or made a happy birthday obscene proposition on your blog. Speculated about less than one year to go before you could take her out to dindin without being accused of cradle robbing. Daydreamed on an internet page in full sleaze-o-vision. Gone suitably ape.

Oh yes.

But no.


Where are you?
You, believe it or NOT, are missed. Sort of. In a way. Well, you know. The silence is deafening.
Squawk why don'tcha.
Please to be audibly alerting us to your precious presence at very soonest, oh Patel Sahib.


周小燕

Caterpillar and Israel - it can't get better than this!

So the big question on everybody's minds is: Did you buy your caterpillar?
Katherine Fuchs wants to know. But, being as she trimmed her mailinglist because of infiltration by ZIONISTS, you might not know that she wants to know, and she might not know that you don't know that she wants to know. Which neither of you would be in any position to know.
And she might not be able to tell you any of that.


Which is why you have me!


All of this is persuant the e-mail which Katherine M. Fuchs sent out in mid-December:
"...we're asking supporters of the Stop Caterkiller campaign to each purchase one share of Caterpillar stock before the end of the year.
While it may seem odd for a group pushing for divestment to encourage purchasing Caterpillar stock, there is a method to our madness. The real point of shareholder divestment is to pressure the corporation to divest of it's activities in the area of concern"

SOURCE:
http://deathbynoodles.blogspot.com/2009/12/caterpillar-and-motorola-stock-which.html

Katherine Fuchs also wrote: "Our purchasing of Cat stock should be kept quite for now. If Caterpillar learns of this strategy they may change the rules of the meeting to require more than one share for entry. "

Katherine M Fuchs is the National Organizer US Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation, which like much of the radical ultra-left is little more than rebranded Marxists and whiners. Middle-class armchair revolutionaries and willing idiots. Katherine Fuchs has been whining, and kvetching, and moaning, and generally pitching ole hissy since her college years, and has never grown beyond that. Katherine M. Fuchs is, to put it bluntly, not a role model.

Anti-Zionist Conspiracy Plotting

Okay, then, lets do some math, shall we? We Chinese are GOOD at math.
Caterpillar is capitolized to the tune of 300 billion. One share is about sixty bucks.
Even if every man, woman, and child, in the country bought one share, Katherine Fuchs dear, and assuming, just assuming, that ALL of those shares were turned towards your dastardly goal, your side still would not have enough stock to sway Caterpillar.

Heck, whatever stock you dummies buy won't even get you one percent.
You guys are pretty st00.000.000.000pid! Please notice that there are as many little round circle characters in how I spelled that word as there are in 300 billion dollars.

Do you feel lame? You should.

Tell me, Ms. Katherine M. Fuchs, how much stock do you now own? What are you going to do with it? Do you realize that despite your own backward ideology and bloodthirsty goals, you have helped underwrite Israeli self-defensive and precautionary measures?
That you, Katherine Fuchs, have sent money towards the very side which you, as a traitorous un-American crypto-Maoist terror-supporter, would not wish to aid?

Gorblimey, Ms. Katherine M. Fuchs, you and all of your friends and bedmates in the "Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation" are a bunch of moronic weasels.
Peace and power out, you sick Fuchs.


周小燕

We like the rats!

We like all manner of rodents, especially if they sing!

This is an oldy but a goody.


Eloquent teeth!


WE LIKE THE MOON!

We like the moon,
Coz it is close to us.
We like the mooooooooooooooon!

But not as much as a spoon,
Coz that's more use for eating soup,
And a fork isn't very useful for that,
Unless it has got many vegetables,
And then you might be better of with a
Chop-stick!

Unlike the moon!
It is up in the sky,
It's up there very high.

But not as high,
As maybe as
Dirigibles or zeppelins,
Or light bulbs!
And maybe clouds.
And puffins also I think maybe
They go quite high too!

Maybe not as high as the moon!
Coz the moon is very high!

We like tha moon!
The moon is very useful everyone!
Everybody like tha moon
It lights tha sky up at night
And it lovely and it makes the tide go and we like it!

But not as much as cheese!

We really like cheese we like zeppelins,
We really like them!
And we like kelp and we like moose,
And we like deer and we like marmots,
And we like all the fluffy animals!
We really like tha moon!


Sheer poetry, man, tell me that isn't beautiful!
It's art.


周小燕

Thank you very much-o, mister pervert-o!

So I happened to look something up on the internet, and was shocked by what I found. And amazed. And actually a little tantalized.
In a nauseated sort of way.

Turns out that the Japanese are absolutely the most pervy bunch of people on the planet.

And it is because of that little fact that I will never wear colored ribbons in my hair, dye my hair green or pink, or put on a little frilly sailor dress.
Nor even think of flashing little striped panties (SHIMAPAN: 縞パン).


Panties!

The Japanese are nuts about feminine flimsies. There's even an animated adventure series about teenage girls and their underwear: SUTOPAN

WARNING: NEITHER OF THE TWO LINKS ABOVE ARE SCHOOL SAFE!
Wait till you're in the public library before clicking on them! I'm serious!
Oh, and NONE of the manga babes in those pictures looks anything at all like me, though I am thinking of using one of them as my facebook picture.


Perverts!

SF blogger Atboth describes the Dutch as sexual degenerates. But they've probably got nothing on the Japanese! Even their forays into occassional light farmyard bestiality must seem fresh and innocent when compared to the sheer tsunami of fetishism, voyeurism, sexfever, artistic bondage sadism and masochism, twisted lust, and obsessive-compulsive genderbending peculiarity of Japan.

See, that's why there's a sex-opera about the Japanese (Madama Butterfly). They'd NEVER be able to write such a thing about the Chinese - we're very private about our predilections. If we have any. Which I doubt.

There aren't even any good Chinese pornofilms!

Or so I have heard.

Trust me, nothing at all in the way of watchable Chinese porn, far better you go watch something Japanese, okay? Go on, nice Japanese smutty-smut waiting FOR YOU!
Nihonmachi is thattaway. You go now, have fun!


There ought to be a warning on the internet for all of us normal people that it is infested with Dutch and Japanese sex monsters.
Of course, without them, the internet would also be far less interesting. Probably nothing but bad recipes and cute cat pictures.
So perhaps the Japanese (and the Dutch) do actually serve a purpose.
They keep us appalled.


周小燕

Sex with teenagers

A schoolteacher who admitted to having a prolonged sexual fling with a thirteen year old student (it started when he was twelve) was sentenced to twenty years in the slammer today.

See this article:
http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/crimesider/main504083.shtml?keyword=boise
And this angry blogpost:
http://atthebackofthehill.blogspot.com/2009/12/clueless-in-holland.html

Oh. The. Humanity. And whatever.

Twenty years sounds about right.

Not for sex.

For abusing her position of trust and authority.

With sex.


If we're gonna slam senators for porking pages, priests for fondling altar boys, and famous European cinmatographers for drugging and sodomizing a pubescent Southern California girl, it makes sense to also prosecute a deranged nymphomaniac in the Midwest (or wherever Idaho is) for jumping a cubscout in her care.

It's primarily a question of not abusing the trust that society has, or has placed, in one.

People in high position should be beyond reproach, like Caesar's wife (Messalina is NOT the example that should come to mind at this point).


Youthful Aardvarking

I like the concept of teenagers having sex, lord knows several of my peers have jumped at the opportunity. But I appreciate the concept primarily because I like to speculate about the sleaze-factor in other people's lives.
It's their sex, their wiggly bits, and their potential oozing infection plus drama, heartache, despair, and insane lust overriding all sense of reason, and all common sense.

Sex is entertainment, especially in the hands of loonies.
Or in whichever part of their anatomy they chose to use.

But a thirteen year old boy is hardly the equal of some crazed cougar who shouldn't be teaching in the first place. Most boys of that age are utter idiots anyway, with only one thing on their minds. It's not like they can actually relate to a women at that age. Other than their moms.


周小燕

Code Pink, in other news....

A fellow blogger who shall remain anonymous but who probably stinks of fine tobacco informs me that the local cell of Code Pink is sooooooo upset over the Egyptians refusing to allow a bunch of troublemakers to cross into Gaza from Sinai that they are planning to starve themselves for two hours - TWO WHOLE HOURS! - per day outside the Egyptian Consulate today, tomorrow, and the day after.


WOW! TWO HOURS OF NO EATING! OH THE HUMANITY!!!


Good frikkin lord. They're insane.

But what set them off?

This:


Gaza marchers on hunger strike in Egypt
Protesters trying to march into Gaza a year after an Israeli offensive are on hunger strike after Egypt blocked them from crossing the border.

Source:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8433010.stm

Quote:
In Cairo hundreds of activists are camped outside the United Nations mission in Cairo trying to get them to pressure the Egyptians to let them cross the border with the Gaza Strip.

And:
The "Viva Palestina" convoy, led by British MP George Galloway, has been blocked from getting on a ferry from Aqaba to the Egyptian town of Nuweiba where it planned to continue by road to the Rafah border crossing.
But now the convoy faces a potentially budget-draining journey back through Jordan to the Syrian port of Latakia, followed by several ferries to El Arish.



REVOLUTIONARIES, RACISTS, AND DUNCES

George Galloway is the notorious agitator and instigator representing the terror supporters residing in Bethnal Green and Bow, which is a pee-poor and largely subliterate part of London, England. He is a member of the house of commons.

The internationals who wish to march into Gaza are largely from the United States. They too are in the main subliterate. And pro-terror.

The CODE PINK dames who intend to starve themselves for two hours a day for three days are Nancy Mancias and Leslie Angeline - also largely subliterate.

The Egyptian Consulate is located at 276 Mallorca Way in San Francisco.

The nearest Pizza place is Marina Pizza & Caffe at 2139 Lombard Street (415-449-9233 ), minimum delivery $12.00, or Pizza Pino at 1534 California Street (415-449-9253 ), minimum delivery $20.00.
I mention this just in case you wish to join Nancy Mancias and Leslie Angeline, and any other Code Pink morons. And plan to enjoy some fine food while watching them starve themselves... FOR... TWO... SOLID... HOURS...
Consider this information a favor from me to you, as I would not want sensible people to go hungry while poking Nancy Mancias and / or Leslie Angeline with sticks. I know how much energy that takes.

Did I already say "oh the humanity"? Oh I did? Oh well.
Have some pizza.
It's for a good cause.

I hope it rains.


周小燕

Make out like a bandit!

That isn't what it sounds like, you perverts. It simply means that if you want good stuff for your birthday, it helps big time if you're cute with a winsome smile.
Which, I'll have you know, I am.

The proof is in the loot.

Tons of books, including several more Nabokov, and some really cool vampire stuff - that would be two of my uncles. Marguerite Yourcenar also, as well as Sherlock Holmes. Death Comes for the Archbishop, too.
I'll be in books till Christmas!

If I go anywhere near the candy, please push me away or shoot me. I'm fat already.


Ma gave me a brassiere. Tres femmy.

I CAN"T WAIT TO SHOW IT OFF! THANKS, MA!

Hee hee hee hee hee!
Kidding.
Thanks you everyone.


周小燕

Getting closer, getting closer!

It's almost here! My birthday! I'll be turning six feet tall and blonde! Yay!


Fooled you, didn't I? You almost believed me. No, I'll just be officially one year older. And magically more mature, too.


I can already smell the cake, though. I hope it's strawberry.


士多啤梨蛋糕
See-toh-bei-li Dan-gow!


Actually, the correct term for strawberry is 草莓果 (tsow mui gwoh - 'grass berry fruit'). Two thick layers of cake bonded together with strawberry chunks in cream, covered in cream, with whipped cream on top. So very delicious!
That will be at home. Plus some pastries for tea the next day: 豆沙酥、老婆餅
Flaky black bean paste buns and elderly auntie (lotus seed paste) buns.
Old people like those better, and they're fun too.

All of this, please understand, is good for the complexion. Honest.


周小燕

Birthday coming up this month

I'll be all of fourteen! Whoopee! Cake from double A on Stockton Street, and presents.
Clothes, of course. I need clothes.

What I really want is strumpet heels. Tall elegant spikes in blood blood red. To go with the lipstick I probably won't be getting either.

The closest I'll come to the harlot shoes will be scarlet socks. Probably just as well, I can't run in heels. And it is impossible to walk up Pacific Street wearing anything but flats.
I hope my uncles give me lots of books. They're good that way.

This is going to be a good month, I can tell.
I think I'll buy myself a can of whipped cream.
Go ahead, guess what I will do with it.


周小燕

Whoopi Goldberg is nuts nuts!

Whoopi Goldberg is barking mad. Yesterday she said that what Roman Polanski did in 1977 wasn't 'rape rape'.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NX_D0Bv9M0&feature=player_embedded
Or
http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid1320151605?bctid=42458619001

He gave her qualudes, he gave her champagne. She said no.


NO!

I have no clue what the difference is between 'rape' plain and simple, and 'rape rape'.
In many Asian languages words are reduplicated for a diminuative or abstracting change of meaning, or to cutesify them. Ms. Goldberg is not Asian. We can only guess at the exact meaning of her daft locution. Rape rape.

By sneeringly calling it rape rape, she pooh-poohs the severity of the act act.

She's a crack crack pot pot.


http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-lopez30-2009sep30,0,4549479.column

Q: Did you resist at that time?
A: A little bit, but not really because . . .
Q: Because what?
A: Because I was afraid of him.
That's Roman Polanski's 13-year-old victim testifying before a grand jury about how the famous director forced himself on her at Jack Nicholson's Mulholland Drive home in March of 1977.
End quote quote.

Roman Polanski first got the girl drunk. Then he gave her half a qualude. Then he undressed her. Then, despite her telling him not to, she didn't want to, please stop, he inserted himself in her. Upon finding out that she wasn't on the pill (in what demented universe are THIRTEEN YEAR OLDS standardly on the pill?), he withdrew and stuck it in her anus. That is when she 'resisted a little bit but not really because she was afraid of him'.

Remember, she was thirteen years old, under the influence of both alcohol and qualude, and alone with a forceful adult man who did not take no for an answer.

Roman Polanski should be castrated - he really can't be trusted with a penis.
Whoopi Goldberg should be committed - she's certifiably loopy.

And all those Hollywood stars, movie people, and European intellectuals who support Roman Polanski and are outraged at his arrest need to shut the F up, and their careers ought to be ruined. Because they are pigs and apologists for rape and child-molestation. It's sick.
Sick sick, sick sick sick, sick-sick sick sick.


周小燕

Alice Walker - Cannibal goddes

There are authors whose books we must read, because they are deep and meaningful and important, and contain a beautiful glorious truth.
Not real thruth, you understand, but deep meaningful important truth.

Truth that is far better than real truth. New improved truth.

Amy Tan, of course. One of the genuine one-shot wonders of the Chinese-American community, whose next book is even more insufferable than the last.
Frank Chin, a Chinese-American playwright who is deeply resentful of the successes of Chinese-American female authors, must also be read - he too represents 'new improved truth'.


Giant purple emasculatrix

One of the greatest inventors of deep meaningful important truth is Alice Walker.
Like Amy Tan, pretty much a one-shot pony.
The Color Purple is a must-read classic, heavens you haven't developed your mind and your soul if you have.... NOT.... READ.... THE COLOR PURPLE!!!!

Insert multicolored exclamation marks here, and break out the emotionally supportive champagne. It is so very deep and meaningful you should cry. Or kill yourself, if you are a white male, but of course you aren't. For at least the several hours that it takes to read The Color Purple, you are the beauteous copper-hued earth-mother, big of breast, timeless and ancient.
Not white. Not male. Not guilty.


And also, almost certainly, not Jewish. Coz if you are Jewish, Ms. Alice Walker sincerely wishes you to understand that you are the paradigm of whiteness and maleness.
And very very guilty.


Let us explore, shall we?



http://proisraelbaybloggers.blogspot.com/2009/09/yes-indeed-boycotts-must-come-from.html
Quote:
Alice Walker is suggesting, not exactly alleging, but musing on the notion that Teva and Naot are using Palestinian prison labor to make sandals for export.
[CUT]
This is pure bigotry, and it's being promoted by a woman who for at least a couple of generations of American feminists and activists has been promoted as a deeply spiritual person, a secular saint, a champion of the oppressed. Children are dying in Sderot, and Walker can't be bothered to care. She's chosen sides in a war she hardly understands, and allied herself with people who care nothing for either Israeli or Palestinian lives. "
End quote.

http://www.democracynow.org/2009/3/9/pulitzer_prize_winning_author_alice_walker
Quote:
"Well, because I really love people, "
End quote.

http://www.yourish.com/2009/03/11/6887
Quote:
Yet another idiot toured Gaza, declared the results of the war horrible, and blamed Israel. This one, though—well, she’s toeing the Hamas propaganda line quite closely.
End quote.

http://www.michnews.com/artman/publish/article_19933.shtml
Quote:
All that said, it’s time for examples that shine light upon Walker’s state of mind: "True to my inner Goddess of the Three Directions ... I [do not] agree with everything Obama stands for…[because] there is not one person I wish to see suffer, no matter what they have done to me or to anyone else; though I understand quite well the place of suffering, often, in human growth."
What is that except an example of pompous, shallow Leftist nonsense spewed with the clarity of the noonday sun.
End quote:

http://www.zimbio.com/President%20of%20Cuba%20Fidel%20Castro/articles/117/Alice+Walker+loving+the+people
Quote:
Alice Walker, it seems, is a woman who cannot love her own daughter or grandson, yet loves the whole American people, despite their inability to write a sentence, despite them being "racist and sexist and greedy above all".
End quote.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article5092964.ece
Quote:
"It is Mr Obama's statement that, when he is President, he (the US) will pursue al-Qaeda in the hills of Pakistan, find Osama bin Laden and "kill" him. Though I understand that Mr Obama wishes to show himself as "strong", even "tough", this is problematic on ethical, moral, and practical levels. "
End quote.



That ought to do it. A sampling from left, right, center, and outerspace.
I love it when we're all on the same page.

The problem with Alice Walker is her cloud-cuckoo-land way of thinking, which is made the more unpalatable by her staggeringly bad writing. The combination of tendentious drivel, new-age codswallop, and self-important meaningfulness fair about makes one puke.

Must-read authors like Ms. Walker will ultimately be responsible for wholesale despoilation, murder, and the burning of books. In reaction, or because of the trauma to the mind that their crap creates.
After reading her latest painful essay, I want to go out there and wallop a Palestinian in revenge.


周小燕

Netanyahu at the UN General Assembly

Transcription of the Israeli Prime Minister's speech.
24/09/2009


Mr. President, Ladies and Gentlemen,

Nearly 62 years ago, the United Nations recognized the right of the Jews, an ancient people 3,500 years-old, to a state of their own in their ancestral homeland.
I stand here today as the Prime Minister of Israel, the Jewish state, and I speak to you on behalf of my country and my people.

The United Nations was founded after the carnage of World War II and the horrors of the Holocaust. It was charged with preventing the recurrence of such horrendous events. Nothing has undermined that central mission more than the systematic assault on the truth.

Yesterday the President of Iran stood at this very podium, spewing his latest anti-Semitic rants. Just a few days earlier, he again claimed that the Holocaust is a lie.
Last month, I went to a villa in a suburb of Berlin called Wannsee. There, on January 20, 1942, after a hearty meal, senior Nazi officials met and decided how to exterminate the Jewish people. The detailed minutes of that meeting have been preserved by successive German governments.

Here is a copy of those minutes, in which the Nazis issued precise instructions on how to carry out the extermination of the Jews. Is this a lie?

A day before I was in Wannsee, I was given in Berlin the original construction plans for the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp. Those plans are signed by Hitler’s deputy, Heinrich Himmler himself. Here is a copy of the plans for Auschwitz-Birkenau, where one million Jews were murdered. Is this too a lie?

This June, President Obama visited the Buchenwald concentration camp. Did President Obama pay tribute to a lie? And what of the Auschwitz survivors whose arms still bear the tattooed numbers branded on them by the Nazis? Are those tattoos a lie?

One-third of all Jews perished in the conflagration. Nearly every Jewish family was affected, including my own. My wife's grandparents, her father’s two sisters and three brothers, and all the aunts, uncles and cousins were all murdered by the Nazis. Is that also a lie?

Yesterday, the man who calls the Holocaust a lie spoke from this podium. To those who refused to come here and to those who left this room in protest, I commend you. You stood up for moral clarity and you brought honor to your countries.

But to those who gave this Holocaust-denier a hearing, I say on behalf of my people, the Jewish people, and decent people everywhere: Have you no shame? Have you no decency?

A mere six decades after the Holocaust, you give legitimacy to a man who denies that the murder of six million Jews took place and pledges to wipe out the Jewish state. What a disgrace! What a mockery of the charter of the United Nations!

Perhaps some of you think that this man and his odious regime threaten only the Jews. You're wrong. History has shown us time and again that what starts with attacks on the Jews eventually ends up engulfing many others.

This Iranian regime is fueled by an extreme fundamentalism that burst onto the world scene three decades ago after lying dormant for centuries.

In the past thirty years, this fanaticism has swept the globe with a murderous violence and cold-blooded impartiality in its choice of victims. It has callously slaughtered Moslems and Christians, Jews and Hindus, and many others. Though it is comprised of different offshoots, the adherents of this unforgiving creed seek to return humanity to medieval times. Wherever they can, they impose a backward regimented society where women, minorities, gays or anyone not deemed to be a true believer is brutally subjugated.

The struggle against this fanaticism does not pit faith against faith nor civilization against civilization. It pits civilization against barbarism, the 21st century against the 9th century, those who sanctify life against those who glorify death. The primitivism of the 9th century ought to be no match for the progress of the 21st century. The allure of freedom, the power of technology, the reach of communications should surely win the day.

Ultimately, the past cannot triumph over the future. And the future offers all nations magnificent bounties of hope. The pace of progress is growing exponentially. It took us centuries to get from the printing press to the telephone, decades to get from the telephone to the personal computer, and only a few years to get from the personal computer to the internet.

What seemed impossible a few years ago is already outdated, and we can scarcely fathom the changes that are yet to come.

We will crack the genetic code. We will cure the incurable. We will lengthen our lives. We will find a cheap alternative to fossil fuels and clean up the planet.

I am proud that my country Israel is at the forefront of these advances – by leading innovations in science and technology, medicine and biology, agriculture and water, energy and the environment. These innovations the world over offer humanity a sunlit future of unimagined promise.

But if the most primitive fanaticism can acquire the most deadly weapons, the march of history could be reversed for a time. And like the belated victory over the Nazis, the forces of progress and freedom will prevail only after a horrific toll of blood and fortune has been exacted from mankind.

That is why the greatest threat facing the world today is the marriage between religious fanaticism and the weapons of mass destruction, and the most urgent challenge facing this body is to prevent the tyrants of Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons.

Are the member states of the United Nations up to that challenge? Will the international community confront a despotism that terrorizes its own people as they bravely stand up for freedom?
Will it take action against the dictators who stole an election in broad daylight and gunned down Iranian protesters who died in the streets choking in their own blood?

Will the international community thwart the world's most pernicious sponsors and practitioners of terrorism?

Above all, will the international community stop the terrorist regime of Iran from developing atomic weapons, thereby endangering the peace of the entire world?
The people of Iran are courageously standing up to this regime. People of goodwill around the world stand with them, as do the thousands who have been protesting outside this hall. Will the United Nations stand by their side?

Ladies and Gentlemen,
The jury is still out on the United Nations, and recent signs are not encouraging.

Rather than condemning the terrorists and their Iranian patrons, some here have condemned their victims. That is exactly what a recent UN report on Gaza did, falsely equating the terrorists with those they targeted.

For eight long years, Hamas fired from Gaza thousands of missiles, mortars and rockets on nearby Israeli cities. Year after year, as these missiles were deliberately hurled at our civilians, not a single UN resolution was passed condemning those criminal attacks.
We heard nothing – absolutely nothing – from the UN Human Rights Council, a misnamed institution if there ever was one.
In 2005, hoping to advance peace, Israel unilaterally withdrew from every inch of Gaza. It dismantled 21 settlements and uprooted over 8,000 Israelis.

We didn't get peace. Instead we got an Iranian backed terror base fifty miles from Tel Aviv. Life in Israeli towns and cities next to Gaza became a nightmare.

You see, the Hamas rocket attacks not only continued, they increased tenfold. Again, the UN was silent.
Finally, after eight years of this unremitting assault, Israel was finally forced to respond. But how should we have responded?

Well, there is only one example in history of thousands of rockets being fired on a country's civilian population. It happened when the Nazis rocketed British cities during World War II.

During that war, the allies leveled German cities, causing hundreds of thousands of casualties. Israel chose to respond differently. Faced with an enemy committing a double war crime of firing on civilians while hiding behind civilians – Israel sought to conduct surgical strikes against the rocket launchers.

That was no easy task because the terrorists were firing missiles from homes and schools, using mosques as weapons depots and ferreting explosives in ambulances.

Israel, by contrast, tried to minimize casualties by urging Palestinian civilians to vacate the targeted areas. We dropped countless flyers over their homes, sent thousands of text messages and called thousands of cell phones asking people to leave.

Never has a country gone to such extraordinary lengths to remove the enemy's civilian population from harm's way. Yet faced with such a clear case of aggressor and victim, who did the UN Human Rights Council decide to condemn? Israel.

A democracy legitimately defending itself against terror is morally hanged, drawn and quartered, and given an unfair trial to boot.
By these twisted standards, the UN Human Rights Council would have dragged Roosevelt and Churchill to the dock as war criminals. What a perversion of truth! What a perversion of justice!

Delegates of the United Nations,
Will you accept this farce? Because if you do, the United Nations would revert to its darkest days, when the worst violators of human rights sat in judgment against the law-abiding democracies, when Zionism was equated with racism and when an automatic majority could declare that the earth is flat.

If this body does not reject this report, it would send a message to terrorists everywhere: Terror pays; if you launch your attacks from densely populated areas, you will win immunity.
And in condemning Israel, this body would also deal a mortal blow to peace. Here's why. When Israel left Gaza, many hoped that the missile attacks would stop. Others believed that at the very least, Israel would have international legitimacy to exercise its right of self-defense.

What legitimacy? What self-defense?

The same UN that cheered Israel as it left Gaza and promised to back our right of self-defense now accuses us –my people, my country - of war crimes? And for what? For acting responsibly in self-defense. What a travesty!

Israel justly defended itself against terror. This biased and unjust report is a clear-cut test for all governments. Will you stand with Israel or will you stand with the terrorists?

We must know the answer to that question now. Now and not later. Because if Israel is again asked to take more risks for peace, we must know today that you will stand with us tomorrow.
Only if we have the confidence that we can defend ourselves can we take further risks for peace.

Ladies and Gentlemen,
All of Israel wants peace. Any time an Arab leader genuinely wanted peace with us, we made peace. We made peace with Egypt led by Anwar Sadat. We made peace with Jordan led by King Hussein.
And if the Palestinians truly want peace, I and my government, and the people of Israel, will make peace. But we want a genuine peace, a defensible peace, a permanent peace.
In 1947, this body voted to establish two states for two peoples – a Jewish state and an Arab state. The Jews accepted that resolution. The Arabs rejected it. We ask the Palestinians to finally do what they have refused to do for 62 years: Say yes to a Jewish state.

Just as we are asked to recognize a nation-state for the Palestinian people, the Palestinians must be asked to recognize the nation state of the Jewish people. The Jewish people are not foreign conquerors in the Land of Israel. This is the land of our forefathers.
Inscribed on the walls outside this building is the great Biblical vision of peace: "Nation shall not lift up sword against nation. They shall learn war no more." These words were spoken by the Jewish prophet Isaiah 2,800 years ago as he walked in my country, in my city - in the hills of Judea and in the streets of Jerusalem. We are not strangers to this land. It is our homeland.

As deeply connected as we are to this land, we recognize that the Palestinians also live there and want a home of their own. We want to live side by side with them, two free peoples living in peace, prosperity and dignity.

But we must have security. The Palestinians should have all the powers to govern themselves except those handful of powers that could endanger Israel.

That is why a Palestinian state must be effectively demilitarized. We don't want another Gaza, another Iranian backed terror base abutting Jerusalem and perched on the hills a few kilometers from Tel Aviv.
We want peace.

I believe such a peace can be achieved. But only if we roll back the forces of terror, led by Iran, that seek to destroy peace, eliminate Israel and overthrow the world order.
The question facing the international community is whether it is prepared to confront those forces or accommodate them.
Over seventy years ago, Winston Churchill lamented what he called the "confirmed unteachability of mankind," the unfortunate habit of civilized societies to sleep until danger nearly overtakes them.

Churchill bemoaned what he called the "want of foresight, the unwillingness to act when action will be simple and effective, the lack of clear thinking, the confusion of counsel until emergency comes, until self-preservation strikes its jarring gong."

I speak here today in the hope that Churchill's assessment of the "unteachability of mankind" is for once proven wrong.
I speak here today in the hope that we can learn from history -- that we can prevent danger in time.
In the spirit of the timeless words spoken to Joshua over 3,000 years ago, let us be strong and of good courage. Let us confront this peril, secure our future and, God willing, forge an enduring peace for generations to come.


Source:
http://www.pmo.gov.il/PMOEng/Communication/PMSpeaks/speechUN240909.htm

-----------------------------------------

Do please take note of which nations walked out on Ahmedinejad's speech, and who stayed to give him his hearing.

Did any of the Arabs walk out?

Also please note who in our own country defends Ahmedinejad, and demands that he and his despicable goons be given the respect due to other nations.

I would offer that among his defenders are Jewish Voice for Peace, Bay Area Women in Black, the International Solidarity Movement, Paul Larudee, Richard Becker, Donna and Darleen Wallach, and every single member of the Students for Justice in Palestine.
In addition to Medea Benjamin, and no doubt Alice Walker.

When the history of this era gets written, the support given to evil ideologies by evil citizens of this country will be a black blot, and the memories of people such as Paul Larudee, Richard Becker, Donna and Darleen Wallach, Medea Benjamin, and (no doubt) Alice Walker, will be considered loathsome.


周小燕